The stability of 65 biochemistry analytes in plasma, serum, and whole blood.

OBJECTIVES: The pre-analytical stability of various biochemical analytes requires careful consideration, as it can lead to the release of erroneous laboratory results. There is currently significant variability in the literature regarding the pre-analytical stability of various analytes. The aim of this study was to determine the pre-analytical stability of 65 analytes in whole blood, serum and plasma using a standardized approach. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 30 healthy volunteers (10 volunteers per analyte) into five vacutainers; either SST, Li-heparin, K2-EDTA, or Na-fluoride/K-oxalate. Several conditions were tested, including delayed centrifugation with storage of whole blood at room temperature (RT) for 8 h, delayed centrifugation with storage of whole blood at RT or 4 °C for 24 h, and immediate centrifugation with storage of plasma or serum at RT for 24 h. Percent deviation (% PD) from baseline was calculated for each analyte and compared to the maximum permissible instability (MPI) derived from intra- and inter-individual biological variation. RESULTS: The majority of the analytes evaluated remained stable across all vacutainer types, temperatures, and timepoints tested. Glucose, potassium, and aspartate aminotransferase, among others, were significantly impacted by delayed centrifugation, having been found to be unstable in whole blood specimens stored at room temperature for 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented provides insight into the pre-analytical variables that impact the stability of routine biochemical analytes. This study may help to reduce the frequency of erroneous laboratory results released due to exceeded stability and reduce unnecessary repeat phlebotomy for analytes that remain stable despite delayed processing.

Evaluation of a New NT-proBNP Immunoassay on an Automated Core Laboratory System.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite improvements in treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the Alere N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity i platform. METHODS: The analytical performance including precision, linearity, limit of quantitation (LOQ), carryover, dilution-recovery, and stability was evaluated. A method comparison between the Abbott Alere NT-proBNP assay and Roche Elecsys proBNP II assay was performed using 70 residual plasma samples. RESULTS: Total imprecision was 4.1%, 3.5%, and 2.3% for low (120.9 ng/L), medium (333.9 ng/L), and high (4767.4 ng/L) QC levels, respectively. The manufacturer's claimed LOQ of 8.3 ng/L was verified. Method comparison between the Alere NT-proBNP assay and the Elecsys proBNP II assay showed good agreement between assays with an R value of 0.998, a slope of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03-1.06), and an intercept of 45.81 (95% CI, -46.6.84 to 138.22). The Bland-Altman plot showed an absolute bias of 250 ng/L or 6.02%. Subrange analysis (NT-proBNP <2000 ng/L) showed good agreement with an R value of 0.998, a slope of 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.06), and an intercept of -4.83 (95% CI, -26.95 to 17.28), with a mean bias of 26 ng/L or 3.2%. The stability of NT-proBNP was also verified in lithium heparin plasma samples stored at 4°C over a 7-day period. Hemolysis and lipemia interference thresholds were verified, but icterus impacted NT-proBNP recovery by >20% at low analyte concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The Alere NT-proBNP assay demonstrated acceptable analytical performance and very good clinical concordance with the Elecsys proBNP II assay.

Electrophoretic Assembly of Antibody-Antigen Complexes Facilitates 1000 Times Improvement in the Limit of Detection of Serological Paper-Based Assay.

Serological assays detect the presence of specific antibodies in blood. There are urgent and important applications for serological point-of-care (POC) assays. However, available detection methods are either insufficiently sensitive or too complex for POC settings. Here, we demonstrate that lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), which is arguably the simplest universal molecular detection approach, can serve as a methodological platform for highly sensitive serological POC assays if combined with a simple, fast, and inexpensive electrophoretic step. In this work, we compared such electrophoretically driven LFIA (eLFIA) with conventional LFIA for the detection of immunoglobulins G against hepatitis B and C in serum. The limit of detection of eLFIA was proven to be 1000 times lower than that of conventional LFIA and sufficiently low to support clinical serological tests. eLFIA takes less than 10 min, requires only a minor accessory powered by a small 9 V battery, and can be performed by an untrained person in the POC environment using a 3 µL specimen of finger-prick capillary blood.

Evaluation of Three Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Immunoassays for Post-Vaccine Response.

BACKGROUND: In North America, both messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2, and Moderna mRNA-1273, each utilizing a 2-dose regimen, have started to be administered to individuals. METHODS: We evaluated the quantitative serologic antibody response following administration of either a single dose or both doses of an mRNA severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in a cohort of 98 participants (88 healthcare workers [HCW] and 10 solid organ transplant [SOT] recipients). Antibody levels were compared across 3 immunoassays: Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche Diagnostics), SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG (DiaSorin), and SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott). RESULTS: Among HCW, sensitivity ranged from 100% (Roche), 99% (Abbott) and 98% (DiaSorin). The SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant and SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG assays showed good agreement with a Pearson correlation coefficient of R = 0.95. Pearson correlation coefficients of R = 0.82 and 0.83 were obtained for Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S vs SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG and SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant vs Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S, respectively. Significant differences in antibody levels between HCW and SOT recipients were observed. A decrease in antibody levels from time of vaccine administration to blood draw was evident. Among those with a second dose, an increase in antibody levels with increased time between administration of the first and second dose was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute values generated from each of the assay platforms are not interchangeable. Antibody levels differed with increased time between vaccine administration and with increased time between administration of the first and second dose. Further, significant differences in antibody levels between HCW and SOT recipients were observed.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM improves clinical sensitivity early in disease course.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is diagnosed by molecular-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Serologic testing detects antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 and IgM specifically may serve as an adjunct test to PCR early in disease. We evaluated the Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG assays along with DiaSorin anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Roche anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total. METHODS: Specimens from 175 PCR-positive patients and 107 control specimens were analyzed using Abbott IgM and IgG, DiaSorin IgG, and Roche Total (IgA, IgG, IgM) assays. Sensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, concordance between assays, trends over time, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. RESULTS: Abbott IgM sensitivity was 63.6% at 0 days post-PCR positivity, 76.5% at 1-5d, 76.3% at 6-14d, 85.2% at 15-30d, and 63.6% at > 30d. All assays exhibited highest sensitivity 15-30d post-PCR positivity (83.3-85.2%). Combining Abbott IgM and IgG improved sensitivity by 22.7% compared to IgG alone when tested 0d post-PCR positivity. All assays had a specificity of 100% and only Abbott IgG exhibited cross-reactivity (anti-dsDNA). Cohen's kappa varied between 0.86 and 0.93. Time to seroconversion from PCR positivity was lowest for Abbott IgM and highest for Abbott IgG. NPV was highest for Abbott IgM < 14 days post-PCR positivity and Abbott IgG ≥ 14 days. CONCLUSION: The Abbott IgM assay exhibited the earliest response and greatest signal in most patients evaluated for serial sampling and had the highest NPV < 14 days post-PCR positivity, suggesting its potential utility as an adjunct test to PCR early in disease course.

Quantitative Measurement of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: Analytical and Clinical Evaluation.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Molecular-based testing is used to diagnose COVID-19, and serologic testing of antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 is used to detect past infection. While most serologic assays are qualitative, a quantitative serologic assay was recently developed that measures antibodies against the S protein, the target of vaccines. Quantitative antibody determination may help determine antibody titer and facilitate longitudinal monitoring of the antibody response, including antibody response to vaccines. We evaluated the quantitative Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay. Specimens from 167 PCR-positive patients and 103 control specimens were analyzed using the Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay on the cobas e411 (Roche Diagnostics). Analytical evaluation included assessing linearity, imprecision, and analytical sensitivity. Clinical evaluation included assessing clinical sensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and serial sampling from the same patient. The Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay exhibited its highest sensitivity (84.0%) at 15 to 30 days post-PCR positivity and exhibited no cross-reactivity, a specificity and PPV of 100%, and an NPV between 98.3% and 99.8% at ≥14 days post-PCR positivity, depending on the seroprevalence estimate. Imprecision was <2% at 9.06 U/ml across 6 days, the negative quality control (QC) was consistently negative (<0.40 U/ml), the manufacturer's claimed limit of quantitation of 0.40 U/ml was verified, and linearity across the analytical measuring range was observed, except at the low end (<20 U/ml). Lastly, antibody response showed high interindividual variation in level and time of peak antibody titer and trends over time.